I like to track developments in the
start-up world and while doing that, I come across many interesting start-up
companies. Electric vehicles, web technologies, mobile applications and many
other innovative ideas are introduced by start-up companies every year. I have
observed that many start-ups begin their journey with a unique customer
problem. Start-ups do a wonderful job in identifying customer needs but then
sometimes they try to do too much too soon. Companies lose focus and start solving
many problems at the same time. Mentors and Angel investors do advice start-ups
to have a laser sharp focus, but I think the definition of focus is not clear.
I have read many articles on web, advising early stage companies to have a laser
sharp focus on products and customer problems. These articles also suggest that
start-up companies should not waste their energy on pursuing activities which
are not core to their mission. I see a problem with this approach, because
focus can also make you irrelevant. Defining the meaning of "focus" is
very important and I am trying to come up with my understanding of focus.
In my opinion, start-up companies should focus on a single customer problem they wish to solve. For example if any company is solving a problem X then it should only focus on solving that problem. Combining solutions for different customer problems into one product is just going to make your product expensive and unsuitable for the mass market deployment. So according to me, the focus should be on the problem the company is trying to solve and not on products, sales and market segments. Let me give you an example, let us imagine a start-up company "XYZ auto" '(I am not suggesting any company here but my thought was influenced by one company I came across in real world) is trying to solve a mobility problem of senior citizens and differently-able people. They have created a nice innovative product to help people move from point A to point B without hassles. Now the primary problem the company solves is "Mobility". So the company should only focus on solving that problem. Now while designing the product, the company will have many choices such as, whether to use high end material, whether to use electric batteries instead of gasoline engine and whether to have low speed or high speed vehicle etc. The company should choose the technology and the product design which effectively solves the primary problem and once they have chosen the technology for that, the next step should be to cut costs, make the product available to entire market and make it affordable for entire target audience. There may be different opinions of experts on this topic, but for me, solving the customer problem and making the product available to everyone who faces that problem is far more important than making cool product. Profitability is important but that should never be the driver for the product design decisions in the beginning.
Reason why I think defining the
focus is important, because start-ups face a huge risk of being irrelevant. The
technology is reshaping landscapes of all industries. If the start-up is focusing
on some technology without paying attention or without evaluating different
options, then there is a huge risk of failure. Many people believe that
start-ups should never diversify as it takes more money, efforts and time to
diversify. But I think start-ups should always work on associated technologies
which will enable them to make quick adjustments to products in case of failure
of selected technology. This approach will help them achieve the mission with
which they started their journey.
So the statement "Focus is very
important" is true, but how you define the focus is also critically
important. My simple approach is to focus on problems and try to solve only one
problem at a time.
Let me know what you all think,
write your opinion in the comments section. I will love to read your point of
view.
No comments:
Post a Comment